Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Timor-Leste: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
100
in 2019
Timor-Leste
100
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 100 against 100 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Timor-Leste?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 100 against 100 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Timor-Leste rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.