Taiwan vs United Arab Emirates: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score

Taiwan
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100
in 2019
Taiwan rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Taiwan
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080100200920142019

How they compare

Taiwan currently reports 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.

Taiwan ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Taiwan United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 83.33 0
2010s 93.33 95 1.67 United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: procedures (number) - score, Taiwan or United Arab Emirates?
Taiwan, at 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: procedures (number) - score between Taiwan and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Taiwan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan and United Arab Emirates?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Taiwan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Taiwan ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.