Bahamas vs South Korea: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Bahamas
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Bahamas rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology) over time
- Bahamas
- South Korea
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Bahamas or South Korea?
- Bahamas, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Bahamas and South Korea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and South Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Bahamas ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.