Cape Verde vs North Macedonia: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Cape Verde
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
North Macedonia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Cape Verde
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Cape Verde or North Macedonia?
- Cape Verde, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Cape Verde and North Macedonia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and North Macedonia rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Cape Verde ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.