Hong Kong, China vs Saint Lucia: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Hong Kong, China
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Lucia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Saint Lucia rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Hong Kong, China or Saint Lucia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Hong Kong, China and Saint Lucia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Saint Lucia rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.