Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Malawi
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Malawi
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Malawi or Papua New Guinea?
- Malawi, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Malawi ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.