Malawi vs South Africa: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Malawi
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Malawi
- South Africa
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 187 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Malawi or South Africa?
- Malawi, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Malawi and South Africa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and South Africa rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Malawi ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.