Niger vs Palestine, State of: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Niger
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Palestine, State of
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Niger rank
1st
Palestine, State of rank
1st
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Niger
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Niger currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Niger ranks 1st and Palestine, State of ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Niger or Palestine, State of?
- Niger, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Niger and Palestine, State of?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Niger and Palestine, State of rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Niger ranks 1st and Palestine, State of ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.