Sao Tome and Principe vs United States of America: Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1)
Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.6 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.6 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th and United States of America ranks 137th of 187 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1), Sao Tome and Principe or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.6 DB16-20 methodology against 0 DB16-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1) between Sao Tome and Principe and United States of America?
- 0.6 DB16-20 methodology, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and United States of America rank globally for getting electricity: regulatory monitoring (0-1)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th and United States of America ranks 137th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Regulatory monitoring (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The regulatory monitoring index evaluates whether a regulator—that is, an entity separate from the utility—monitors the utility’s performance on reliability of supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the regulator performs periodic or real-time reviews. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.