Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 75 against 75 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 60th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 75 against 75 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 60th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.