Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Namibia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
75
in 2019
Namibia
75
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Namibia
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 75 against 75 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Namibia?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 75 against 75 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Namibia rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.