Ecuador vs United States of America: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Ecuador
87.5
in 2019
United States of America
90
in 2019
Ecuador rank
28th
United States of America rank
27th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Ecuador
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 90 against 87.5 in Ecuador, a difference of 2.5.
Across all 6 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 28th and United States of America ranks 27th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Ecuador or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 90 against 87.5 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Ecuador and United States of America?
- 2.5, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States of America?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and United States of America rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and United States of America ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.