Egypt vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Egypt
62.5
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
62.5
in 2019
Egypt rank
90th
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
90th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Egypt
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 62.5 against 62.5 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 90th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Egypt or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Egypt, at 62.5 against 62.5 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Egypt and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Egypt and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Egypt ranks 90th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.