Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Montenegro: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Iran, Islamic Republic of
62.5
in 2019
Montenegro
62.5
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
90th
Montenegro rank
90th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Montenegro
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 62.5 against 62.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 90th and Montenegro ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Montenegro?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 62.5 against 62.5 in Montenegro as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Montenegro?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Montenegro rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 90th and Montenegro ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.