Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Trinidad and Tobago: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
75
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
75
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
60th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
60th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 75 against 75 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 75 against 75 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.