Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Mongolia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff
Lao People's Democratic Republic
37.5
in 2019
Mongolia
37.5
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
125th
Mongolia rank
125th
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Mongolia
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 125th of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Mongolia?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mongolia?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mongolia rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 125th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.