Grenada vs Mongolia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff

Grenada
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
125th
Mongolia rank
125th

Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff over time

  • Grenada
  • Mongolia
01234201420162019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mongolia ahead.

Grenada ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 125th of 187 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff, Grenada or Mongolia?
Grenada, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff between Grenada and Mongolia?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mongolia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Mongolia rank globally for getting electricity: reliability of supply and transparency of tariff?
Grenada ranks 125th and Mongolia ranks 125th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Mongolia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/grenada/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-reliability-of-supply-and-transparency-of-tariff-index-0-8-db16-20/grenada/mongolia/">Grenada vs Mongolia: Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index is calculated on the basis of the following six components: (i) duration and frequency of power outages, (ii) tools to monitor power outages, (iii) tools to restore power supply, (iv) regulatory monitoring of utilities’ performance, (v) financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, and (vi) transparency and accessibility of tariffs. An economy is eligible to obtain a score on the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index only if (i) the utility collects data on all types of outages (average total duration of outages per customer and the average number of outages per customer), including planned and unplanned outages, as well as load shedding, with the minimum outage time of not more than 5 minutes; and (ii) the SAIDI value is below a threshold of 100 hours and the SAIFI value is under 100 outages. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.