Australia vs Canada: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Australia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Canada
0.98 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
75th
Canada rank
77th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 0.98 DB16-20 methodology in Canada, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 75th and Canada ranks 77th of 125 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Australia or Canada?
- Australia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 0.98 DB16-20 methodology in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Australia and Canada?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Australia ranks 75th and Canada ranks 77th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.