Australia vs Kazakhstan: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Australia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kazakhstan
0.96 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
75th
Kazakhstan rank
78th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 0.96 DB16-20 methodology in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.04 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Australia ranks 75th and Kazakhstan ranks 78th of 125 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Australia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 0.96 DB16-20 methodology in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 0.04 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Australia ranks 75th and Kazakhstan ranks 78th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.