Australia vs United States: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Australia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United States
1.28 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
75th
United States rank
73rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Australia
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 1.28 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Australia, a difference of 0.28 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes United States's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United States ahead.
Australia ranks 75th and United States ranks 73rd of 125 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Australia or United States?
- United States, at 1.28 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Australia and United States?
- 0.28 DB16-20 methodology, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United States?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and United States rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Australia ranks 75th and United States ranks 73rd of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.