Austria vs Iceland: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Austria
0.63 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland
0.63 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Austria rank
87th
Iceland rank
87th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Austria
- Iceland
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.63 DB16-20 methodology against 0.63 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 87th of 125 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Austria or Iceland?
- Austria, at 0.63 DB16-20 methodology against 0.63 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Austria and Iceland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Iceland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Austria ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 87th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.