Azerbaijan vs China: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Azerbaijan
0.86 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China
0.896 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
82nd
China rank
79th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Azerbaijan
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0.896 DB16-20 methodology against 0.86 DB16-20 methodology in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.036 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and China ranks 79th of 125 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Azerbaijan or China?
- China, at 0.896 DB16-20 methodology against 0.86 DB16-20 methodology in Azerbaijan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Azerbaijan and China?
- 0.036 DB16-20 methodology, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and China rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and China ranks 79th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.