Belarus vs Denmark: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Belarus
0.51 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Belarus rank
96th
Denmark rank
98th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Belarus
- Denmark
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.51 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Denmark ahead.
Belarus ranks 96th and Denmark ranks 98th of 125 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Belarus or Denmark?
- Belarus, at 0.51 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Belarus and Denmark?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Denmark?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Denmark rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Belarus ranks 96th and Denmark ranks 98th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.