Brazil vs Iran: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Brazil
6.64 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iran
7 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Brazil rank
34th
Iran rank
32nd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Brazil
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 7 DB16-20 methodology against 6.64 DB16-20 methodology in Brazil, a difference of 0.36 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Iran's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 34th and Iran ranks 32nd of 127 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Brazil or Iran?
- Iran, at 7 DB16-20 methodology against 6.64 DB16-20 methodology in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Brazil and Iran?
- 0.36 DB16-20 methodology, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iran?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Iran rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Brazil ranks 34th and Iran ranks 32nd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.