Cape Verde vs Cote d'Ivoire: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Cape Verde
18.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire
14.42 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
17th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
18th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Cape Verde
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 18.3 DB16-20 methodology against 14.42 DB16-20 methodology in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 3.88 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.3 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 17th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 127 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Cape Verde or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cape Verde, at 18.3 DB16-20 methodology against 14.42 DB16-20 methodology in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Cape Verde and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 3.88 DB16-20 methodology, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Cape Verde ranks 17th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.