Cabo Verde vs Côte d'Ivoire: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Cabo Verde
18.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire
14.42 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cabo Verde rank
17th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
18th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Cabo Verde
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 18.3 DB16-20 methodology against 14.42 DB16-20 methodology in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 3.88 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.3 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 17th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 126 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Cabo Verde or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Cabo Verde, at 18.3 DB16-20 methodology against 14.42 DB16-20 methodology in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Cabo Verde and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 3.88 DB16-20 methodology, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Cabo Verde and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Cabo Verde ranks 17th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 18th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.