Canada vs Latvia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Canada
0.98 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
0.99 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Canada rank
79th
Latvia rank
78th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Canada
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.99 DB16-20 methodology against 0.98 DB16-20 methodology in Canada, a difference of 0.01 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Canada ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 78th of 127 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Canada or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.99 DB16-20 methodology against 0.98 DB16-20 methodology in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Canada and Latvia?
- 0.01 DB16-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Latvia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Canada ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 78th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.