Chile vs Indonesia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Chile
2.9 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia
2.82 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
56th
Indonesia rank
57th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Chile
- Indonesia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2.9 DB16-20 methodology against 2.82 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0.08 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Indonesia ranks 57th of 127 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Chile or Indonesia?
- Chile, at 2.9 DB16-20 methodology against 2.82 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Chile and Indonesia?
- 0.08 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Indonesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Indonesia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Chile ranks 56th and Indonesia ranks 57th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.