Chile vs Romania: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Chile
2.9 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
3.08 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
54th
Romania rank
53rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Chile
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3.08 DB16-20 methodology against 2.9 DB16-20 methodology in Chile, a difference of 0.18 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 54th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Chile or Romania?
- Romania, at 3.08 DB16-20 methodology against 2.9 DB16-20 methodology in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Chile and Romania?
- 0.18 DB16-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Romania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Chile ranks 54th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.