Chile vs Solomon Islands: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Chile
2.9 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Solomon Islands
3.1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
56th
Solomon Islands rank
54th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Chile
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 3.1 DB16-20 methodology against 2.9 DB16-20 methodology in Chile, a difference of 0.2 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Chile ranks 56th and Solomon Islands ranks 54th of 127 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Chile or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 3.1 DB16-20 methodology against 2.9 DB16-20 methodology in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Chile and Solomon Islands?
- 0.2 DB16-20 methodology, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Chile ranks 56th and Solomon Islands ranks 54th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.