China vs Kazakhstan: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
China
0.896 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kazakhstan
0.96 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
China rank
79th
Kazakhstan rank
78th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.96 DB16-20 methodology against 0.896 DB16-20 methodology in China, a difference of 0.064 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was China ahead.
China ranks 79th and Kazakhstan ranks 78th of 125 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, China or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.96 DB16-20 methodology against 0.896 DB16-20 methodology in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between China and Kazakhstan?
- 0.064 DB16-20 methodology, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- China ranks 79th and Kazakhstan ranks 78th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.