Colombia vs Fiji: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Colombia
4.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Fiji
5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Colombia rank
42nd
Fiji rank
39th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Colombia
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 5 DB16-20 methodology against 4.5 DB16-20 methodology in Colombia, a difference of 0.5 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 42nd and Fiji ranks 39th of 125 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Colombia or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 5 DB16-20 methodology against 4.5 DB16-20 methodology in Colombia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Colombia and Fiji?
- 0.5 DB16-20 methodology, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Fiji?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Colombia and Fiji rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Colombia ranks 42nd and Fiji ranks 39th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.