Croatia vs New Zealand: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Croatia
3.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
3.77 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia rank
51st
New Zealand rank
48th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Croatia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 3.77 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia, a difference of 0.47 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 48th of 126 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Croatia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 3.77 DB16-20 methodology against 3.3 DB16-20 methodology in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Croatia and New Zealand?
- 0.47 DB16-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and New Zealand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Croatia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 48th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.