Croatia vs Romania: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Croatia
3.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
3.08 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia rank
50th
Romania rank
53rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Croatia
- Romania
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3.3 DB16-20 methodology against 3.08 DB16-20 methodology in Romania, a difference of 0.22 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 50th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Croatia or Romania?
- Croatia, at 3.3 DB16-20 methodology against 3.08 DB16-20 methodology in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Croatia and Romania?
- 0.22 DB16-20 methodology, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Romania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Croatia ranks 50th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.