Croatia vs Solomon Islands: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Croatia
3.3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Solomon Islands
3.1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Croatia rank
51st
Solomon Islands rank
53rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Croatia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3.3 DB16-20 methodology against 3.1 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.2 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Croatia ranks 51st and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 126 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Croatia or Solomon Islands?
- Croatia, at 3.3 DB16-20 methodology against 3.1 DB16-20 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Croatia and Solomon Islands?
- 0.2 DB16-20 methodology, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Croatia ranks 51st and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.