Czechia vs Denmark: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Czechia
0.48 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Czechia rank
101st
Denmark rank
98th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Czechia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Czechia, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 101st and Denmark ranks 98th of 125 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Czechia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Czechia and Denmark?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Denmark?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Denmark rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Czechia ranks 101st and Denmark ranks 98th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.