Denmark vs Malaysia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Denmark
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
0.48 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Denmark rank
98th
Malaysia rank
101st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Denmark
- Malaysia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malaysia ahead.
Denmark ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 101st of 125 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Denmark or Malaysia?
- Denmark, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.48 DB16-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Denmark and Malaysia?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Malaysia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Denmark ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 101st of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.