Fiji vs Palestine: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Fiji
5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Palestine
5.18 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Fiji rank
41st
Palestine rank
40th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Fiji
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 5.18 DB16-20 methodology against 5 DB16-20 methodology in Fiji, a difference of 0.18 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Palestine ahead.
Fiji ranks 41st and Palestine ranks 40th of 127 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Fiji or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 5.18 DB16-20 methodology against 5 DB16-20 methodology in Fiji as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Fiji and Palestine?
- 0.18 DB16-20 methodology, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Palestine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Fiji and Palestine rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Fiji ranks 41st and Palestine ranks 40th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.