Hong Kong, China vs Malaysia: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Hong Kong, China
0.46 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
0.48 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
105th
Malaysia rank
103rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.48 DB16-20 methodology against 0.46 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Malaysia ranks 103rd of 127 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Hong Kong, China or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0.48 DB16-20 methodology against 0.46 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Hong Kong, China and Malaysia?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Malaysia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Malaysia ranks 103rd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.