Hong Kong, China vs Thailand: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Hong Kong, China
0.46 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
0.38 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
105th
Thailand rank
108th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Thailand
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.46 DB16-20 methodology against 0.38 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0.08 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Thailand ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Thailand ranks 108th of 127 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Hong Kong, China or Thailand?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.46 DB16-20 methodology against 0.38 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Hong Kong, China and Thailand?
- 0.08 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Thailand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Thailand ranks 108th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.