Iceland vs Netherlands: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Iceland
0.63 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands
0.78 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland rank
89th
Netherlands rank
87th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Iceland
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 0.78 DB16-20 methodology against 0.63 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland, a difference of 0.15 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Netherlands ahead.
Iceland ranks 89th and Netherlands ranks 87th of 127 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Iceland or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 0.78 DB16-20 methodology against 0.63 DB16-20 methodology in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Iceland and Netherlands?
- 0.15 DB16-20 methodology, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Netherlands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Netherlands rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Iceland ranks 89th and Netherlands ranks 87th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.