Iceland vs Sweden: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Iceland
0.63 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
0.61 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland rank
89th
Sweden rank
91st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Iceland
- Sweden
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.63 DB16-20 methodology against 0.61 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.
Iceland ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 91st of 127 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Iceland or Sweden?
- Iceland, at 0.63 DB16-20 methodology against 0.61 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Iceland and Sweden?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Iceland ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 91st of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.