Indonesia vs Romania: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Indonesia
2.82 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania
3.08 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
55th
Romania rank
53rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Indonesia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3.08 DB16-20 methodology against 2.82 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia, a difference of 0.26 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Romania ahead.
Indonesia ranks 55th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Indonesia or Romania?
- Romania, at 3.08 DB16-20 methodology against 2.82 DB16-20 methodology in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Indonesia and Romania?
- 0.26 DB16-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Romania rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Indonesia ranks 55th and Romania ranks 53rd of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.