Japan vs South Korea: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Japan
0.0375 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Korea
0.04 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan rank
125th
South Korea rank
124th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Japan
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.04 DB16-20 methodology against 0.0375 DB16-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0.0025 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 125th and South Korea ranks 124th of 125 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Japan or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 0.04 DB16-20 methodology against 0.0375 DB16-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Japan and South Korea?
- 0.0025 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Korea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Japan ranks 125th and South Korea ranks 124th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.