Japan vs Singapore: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Japan
0.0375 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore
0.06 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan rank
127th
Singapore rank
125th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Japan
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.06 DB16-20 methodology against 0.0375 DB16-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0.0225 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.6 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 127th and Singapore ranks 125th of 127 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Japan or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.06 DB16-20 methodology against 0.0375 DB16-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Japan and Singapore?
- 0.0225 DB16-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Singapore rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Japan ranks 127th and Singapore ranks 125th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.