Kosovo vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index
Kosovo
10.42 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
940 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kosovo rank
24th
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index over time
- Kosovo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 940 DB16-20 methodology against 10.42 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo, a difference of 929.58 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 90.2 times Kosovo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Kosovo or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 940 DB16-20 methodology against 10.42 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Kosovo and Papua New Guinea?
- 929.58 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Kosovo ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.