Latvia vs Poland: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Latvia
0.99 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland
1.13 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
78th
Poland rank
76th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Latvia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 1.13 DB16-20 methodology against 0.99 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0.14 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 78th and Poland ranks 76th of 127 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Latvia or Poland?
- Poland, at 1.13 DB16-20 methodology against 0.99 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Latvia and Poland?
- 0.14 DB16-20 methodology, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Poland rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Latvia ranks 78th and Poland ranks 76th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.