Lithuania vs Thailand: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Lithuania
0.4 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
0.38 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Lithuania rank
105th
Thailand rank
106th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Lithuania
- Thailand
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.4 DB16-20 methodology against 0.38 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0.02 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Thailand ahead.
Lithuania ranks 105th and Thailand ranks 106th of 125 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Lithuania or Thailand?
- Lithuania, at 0.4 DB16-20 methodology against 0.38 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Lithuania and Thailand?
- 0.02 DB16-20 methodology, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Thailand rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Lithuania ranks 105th and Thailand ranks 106th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.