Mauritius vs Norway: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI
Mauritius
1.61 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius rank
66th
Norway rank
68th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.61 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Norway, a difference of 0.11 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 66th and Norway ranks 68th of 125 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at 1.61 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi between Mauritius and Norway?
- 0.11 DB16-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index (saidi?
- Mauritius ranks 66th and Norway ranks 68th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.