Moldova vs Norway: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Moldova
1.33 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Norway
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Moldova rank
73rd
Norway rank
70th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Moldova
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.33 DB16-20 methodology in Moldova, a difference of 0.17 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 73rd and Norway ranks 70th of 127 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Moldova or Norway?
- Norway, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.33 DB16-20 methodology in Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Moldova and Norway?
- 0.17 DB16-20 methodology, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Moldova and Norway rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Moldova ranks 73rd and Norway ranks 70th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.