Mongolia vs Sudan: Getting electricity: System average interruption duration
Mongolia
62 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan
58.6 DB16-20 methodology
in 2018
Mongolia rank
6th
Sudan rank
8th
Getting electricity: System average interruption duration over time
- Mongolia
- Sudan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 62 DB16-20 methodology against 58.6 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 3.4 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 8th of 127 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption duration index, Mongolia or Sudan?
- Mongolia, at 62 DB16-20 methodology against 58.6 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption duration index between Mongolia and Sudan?
- 3.4 DB16-20 methodology, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and Sudan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption duration index?
- Mongolia ranks 6th and Sudan ranks 8th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption duration index is the average total duration of outages (in hours) experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.